Monday, February 06, 2006

 

Do the Ends Justify the Means?


On April 21, 2003, the now infamous Judith Miller wrote a front page article in the Times entitled:

AFTEREFFECTS: PROHIBITED WEAPONS; Illicit Arms Kept Till Eve of War, An Iraqi Scientist Is Said to Assert

In response to that article specifically and to all of the articles and newscasts generally which played a decisive role in convincing the public that there were WMD's in Iraq, I sent a brief "letter to the editor" to the paper, published two days later, which read:

To the Editor:

Re ''Illicit Arms Kept Till Eve of War, an Iraqi Scientist Is Said to Assert'' (front page, April 21):

In the months leading up to the war, the United States asserted with absolute certainty that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and that it had a dossier of sites, types, informants and so on.

Would it not make sense, then, with Iraq now under American control, to have already gone to these sites with our special inspection teams and to have demonstrated to the world that what we said was valid?

HERBERT PERESS
New York, April 21, 2003


That story continues to resonate and tonight on PBS, David Brancaccio hosted a 1/2 hour special on NOW in which his guest Lawrence Wilkerson, Sec'y of State Powell's Chief of Staff, when the latter was head of the State Department, talked about all of this in the context of how this administration mislead the public and the world.......There's lots of information at the show's site.......look it over.

This continues to be one of the most important issues of the day..........in spite of what I sense is the administration's ploy to try and pull this all off by invoking in its defense the age old adage of "the end justifying the means," assuming that we might see (or the administration may try to show) a very slow but steady improvement in some of the metrics, strictly vis-a-vis Iraq.

Stay tuned......

Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?